Tennessee v. Garner is associated with which policing concept in the context of active shooter?

Tennessee v. Garner is associated with which policing concept in the context of active shooter?

• A. Use of deadly force
• B. Stop-and-frisk
• C. Verbal de-escalation
• D. Warrants

Answer: (A)

Use of deadly force. Tennessee v. Garner holds that deadly force may not be used against a fleeing suspect to prevent escape unless there is probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm to the officer or others. In an active shooter context, this means lethal force is justified only when the suspect’s actions create an imminent threat; it cannot be used merely to stop someone from fleeing. The other options don’t address this policy: stop-and-frisk concerns stopping someone on reasonable suspicion to search for weapons, verbal de-escalation focuses on reducing violence through communication, and warrants are about legal procedures for searches.

Use of deadly force. Tennessee v. Garner holds that deadly force may not be used against a fleeing suspect to prevent escape unless there is probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm to the officer or others. In an active shooter context, this means lethal force is justified only when the suspect’s actions create an imminent threat; it cannot be used merely to stop someone from fleeing. The other options don’t address this policy: stop-and-frisk concerns stopping someone on reasonable suspicion to search for weapons, verbal de-escalation focuses on reducing violence through communication, and warrants are about legal procedures for searches.